Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs SPHQ: how they differ

QQQM and SPHQ hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SPHQ hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMSPHQ
Apple Inc.7.29%4.51%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.09%3.54%
Costco Wholesale Corp.1.86%4.82%
Lam Research Corp.1.75%4.10%
Applied Materials, Inc.1.57%2.80%
QUALCOMM Inc.1.18%2.03%
KLA Corp.1.11%3.27%
AppLovin Corp.0.83%1.56%
Western Digital Corp.0.79%2.15%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.0.73%2.28%
Adobe Inc.0.46%1.45%
Constellation Energy Corp.0.46%0.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Visa Inc. 4.69%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%Mastercard Inc. 4.32%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%General Electric Co. 4.16%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46%
Alphabet Inc. 3.52%Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%GE Vernova Inc. 3.15%
Broadcom Inc. 3.37%Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QQQM and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isNasdaq-100S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%99.9%
Holdings10199

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SPHQ?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQM-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources