Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs SPMO: how they differ

QQQ and SPMO hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and SPMO hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQSPMO
NVIDIA Corp.8.16%8.46%
Micron Technology, Inc.4.80%10.72%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.3.70%4.14%
Alphabet Inc.3.52%4.81%
Broadcom Inc.3.37%7.58%
Alphabet Inc.3.26%3.81%
Intel Corp.2.52%2.95%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.09%2.02%
Lam Research Corp.1.75%3.54%
Applied Materials, Inc.1.57%1.77%
Palantir Technologies Inc.1.58%1.39%
KLA Corp.1.11%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in SPMO
Apple Inc. 7.29%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%Caterpillar Inc. 2.60%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%General Electric Co. 1.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.97%Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) 1.43%
Walmart Inc. 2.48%RTX Corp. 1.40%
Costco Wholesale Corp. 1.86%GE Vernova Inc. 1.33%
Netflix, Inc. 1.59%Amphenol Corp. 1.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

QQQ and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isNasdaq-100, book from QQQMS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings10199

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPMO?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources