Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs SDY: how they differ

QQQ and SDY hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and SDY hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQSDY
Texas Instruments Inc.1.22%1.56%
QUALCOMM Inc.1.18%1.57%
PepsiCo, Inc.0.87%1.33%
Analog Devices, Inc.0.89%0.61%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.0.39%1.54%
CSX Corp.0.37%0.62%
Microsoft Corp.5.32%0.36%
Cintas Corp.0.30%0.43%
Walmart Inc.2.48%0.29%
Microchip Technology Inc.0.23%1.32%
Fastenal Co.0.22%0.91%
Xcel Energy Inc.0.22%1.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Apple Inc. 7.29%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
Alphabet Inc. 3.52%Target Corp 1.55%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%Edison International 1.45%
Broadcom Inc. 3.37%Sysco Corp 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QQQ and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100, book from QQQMSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%84.6%
Holdings101155

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and SDY returned +11.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SDY?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources