Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VWO?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PULS or VWO?

PULS charges 0.15% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PULS vs VWO: how they differ

PULS and VWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VWO returned more over the year.

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in PULS	Only in VWO
PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 14.73%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%	Tencent Holdings Ltd 3.28%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%	Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.57%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%	Delta Electronics Inc 1.18%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%	MediaTek Inc 1.07%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%	Reliance Industries Ltd 0.90%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%	HDFC Bank Ltd 0.81%
BROADCOM INC 0.56%	Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

PULS and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	VWO Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PGIM	Vanguard
What it is	PGIM Ultra Short Bond	Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year	+4.2%	+15.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.3 pts	−1.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.06%
Holdings	553	6355

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VWO in plain words

VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VWO?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VWO?: PULS charges 0.15% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PULS against VWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against VWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-VWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources