Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XLK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PDBC or XLK?

PDBC charges 0.59% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PDBC vs XLK: how they differ

PDBC and XLK are both equity index funds, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against +39.2%.

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

PDBC and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Invesco	State Street
What it is	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy	Technology
Total return, 1 year	+55.2%	+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+37.7 pts	+21.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	74

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XLK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or XLK?: PDBC charges 0.59% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PDBC against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PDBC against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PDBC-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources