Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or PDBC?

ACWI charges 0.32% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs PDBC: how they differ

ACWI and PDBC are both equity index funds, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against +19.1%.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

ACWI and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	MSCI ACWI	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.59%
Holdings	2307	not filed

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or PDBC?: ACWI charges 0.32% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against PDBC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-PDBC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources