Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PDBC or PULS?

PDBC charges 0.59% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PDBC vs PULS: how they differ

PDBC is an equity index fund and PULS a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against +4.2%.

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

PDBC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Invesco	PGIM
What it is	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+55.2%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+37.7 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	553

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or PULS?: PDBC charges 0.59% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PDBC against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PDBC against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PDBC-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources