Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs XBI: how they differ

ONEQ and XBI hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and XBI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQXBI
AMGEN INC0.40%1.00%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.36%0.97%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.25%1.06%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.14%0.96%
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.09%0.96%
NATERA INC0.07%1.17%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC0.07%1.21%
BIOGEN INC0.06%1.03%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP DEL0.05%0.93%
INSMED INC0.05%1.08%
MODERNA INC0.04%1.41%
INCYTE CORP0.04%1.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in XBI
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Roivant Sciences Ltd 1.16%
APPLE INC 10.04%Alkermes PLC 1.11%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%AbbVie Inc 1.04%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%uniQure NV 1.03%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%CRISPR Therapeutics AG 1.02%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%Arcus Biosciences Inc 0.74%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%Absci Corp 0.56%
TESLA INC 3.58%Biohaven Ltd 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isNasdaq CompositeSPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%8.5%
Holdings1022150

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or XBI?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources