Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ONEQ vs VT: how they differ
ONEQ and VT hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VT hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ONEQ | VT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 11.24% | 4.22% |
| APPLE INC | 10.04% | 3.53% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 7.32% | 2.73% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 6.37% | 2.29% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.85% | 2.04% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.64% | 1.74% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.48% | 1.61% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.03% | 1.21% |
| TESLA INC | 3.58% | 0.97% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.38% | 0.52% |
| WALMART INC | 2.02% | 0.52% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.84% | 0.52% |
| Only in ONEQ | Only in VT |
|---|---|
| LINDE PLC 0.50% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52% |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.42% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.72% |
| ASML HOLDING NV 0.31% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.69% |
| NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.17% | Eli Lilly & Co 0.68% |
| FLEX LTD 0.12% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64% |
| PDD HOLDINGS INC 0.12% | Exxon Mobil Corp 0.59% |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV 0.11% | ASML Holding NV 0.51% |
| ARM HOLDINGS LIMITED 0.11% | Visa Inc 0.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | Nasdaq Composite | Total World Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.6% | +18.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.1 pts | +1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.06% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 87.4% | 55.2% |
| Holdings | 1022 | 10042 |
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
VT in plain words
VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VT?
- ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ONEQ and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources