Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs VOX: how they differ

ONEQ and VOX hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VOX hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and VOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQVOX
ALPHABET INC4.85%16.14%
ALPHABET INC4.48%10.61%
META PLATFORMS INC3.03%21.12%
NETFLIX INC0.79%4.77%
T-MOBILE US INC0.45%2.50%
COMCAST CORP0.19%2.36%
WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC0.14%2.74%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC0.11%2.00%
TAKE-TWO INTERACTV SOFTWR INC0.09%2.09%
AST SPACEMOBILE INC0.07%1.42%
ECHOSTAR CORP0.04%1.09%
LIBERTY MEDIA CORP-LIBERTY FORMULA ONE0.04%1.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in VOX
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Verizon Communications Inc 4.17%
APPLE INC 10.04%Walt Disney Co/The 3.96%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%AT&T Inc 3.69%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 1.65%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%Omnicom Group Inc 1.38%
TESLA INC 3.58%ROBLOX Corp 1.37%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.38%Reddit Inc 1.07%
WALMART INC 2.02%TKO Group Holdings Inc 0.83%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and VOX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isNasdaq CompositeCommunication Services
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%84.5%
Holdings1022114

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VOX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VOX returned +2.9%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VOX?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VOX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against VOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources