Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs VONG: how they differ

ONEQ and VONG hold 66% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VONG hold 66% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQVONG
NVIDIA CORP11.24%13.09%
APPLE INC10.04%11.97%
MICROSOFT CORP7.32%8.98%
AMAZON.COM INC6.37%5.07%
BROADCOM INC4.64%5.78%
ALPHABET INC4.85%3.91%
TESLA INC3.58%3.48%
ALPHABET INC4.48%3.15%
META PLATFORMS INC3.03%3.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC1.84%1.47%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.93%1.28%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.87%1.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in VONG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.38%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
INTEL CORP 1.25%Visa Inc 1.57%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04%Mastercard Inc 1.20%
SANDISK CORP/DE 0.55%AbbVie Inc 1.16%
LINDE PLC 0.50%Oracle Corp 1.15%
T-MOBILE US INC 0.45%General Electric Co 1.02%
ANALOG DEVICES INC 0.44%GE Vernova Inc 0.79%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.42%Home Depot Inc/The 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isNasdaq CompositeRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%95.6%
Holdings1022387

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VONG returned +7.2%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VONG?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 66% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources