Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs VO: how they differ

ONEQ and VO hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VO hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQVO
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.39%1.07%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP0.23%0.78%
FORTINET INC0.22%0.46%
DATADOG INC0.18%0.84%
ROCKET LAB CORP0.18%0.57%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC0.17%0.63%
ROSS STORES INC0.16%0.67%
ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC0.16%0.77%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC0.15%0.36%
CINTAS CORP0.15%0.28%
WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC0.14%0.62%
DOORDASH INC0.14%0.66%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in VO
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
APPLE INC 10.04%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%Cummins Inc 0.95%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%Cloudflare Inc 0.76%
TESLA INC 3.58%Valero Energy Corp 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isNasdaq CompositeMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%91.4%
Holdings1022282

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VO returned +12.0%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VO?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources