Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs SPYG: how they differ

ONEQ and SPYG hold 63% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SPYG hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQSPYG
NVIDIA CORP11.24%13.66%
MICROSOFT CORP7.32%7.81%
APPLE INC10.04%5.99%
ALPHABET INC4.85%5.91%
BROADCOM INC4.64%5.04%
ALPHABET INC4.48%4.71%
AMAZON.COM INC6.37%3.48%
META PLATFORMS INC3.03%3.49%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC2.38%3.67%
TESLA INC3.58%2.07%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC1.84%2.67%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.87%1.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in SPYG
WALMART INC 2.02%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
INTEL CORP 1.25%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.93%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 0.60%Caterpillar Inc 1.38%
QUALCOMM INC 0.58%Johnson & Johnson 1.02%
LINDE PLC 0.50%GE Vernova Inc 0.89%
T-MOBILE US INC 0.45%Visa Inc 0.88%
ANALOG DEVICES INC 0.44%Mastercard Inc 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isNasdaq CompositeSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%100.0%
Holdings1022147

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SPYG?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 63% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources