Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ONEQ vs SPYD: how they differ
ONEQ and SPYD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SPYD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ONEQ | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| PEPSICO INC | 0.43% | 1.11% |
| COMCAST CORP | 0.19% | 1.02% |
| EXELON CORP | 0.10% | 1.25% |
| FIFTH THIRD BANCORP | 0.10% | 1.28% |
| HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/OH | 0.07% | 1.14% |
| KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP | 0.07% | 1.32% |
| KRAFT HEINZ CO | 0.07% | 1.27% |
| PRICE (T ROWE) GROUP INC | 0.05% | 1.29% |
| PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC | 0.05% | 1.42% |
| VIATRIS INC | 0.04% | 1.46% |
| EVERGY INC | 0.04% | 1.35% |
| HOST HOTELS and RESORTS INC | 0.03% | 1.53% |
| Only in ONEQ | Only in SPYD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 11.24% | Iron Mountain Inc 1.62% |
| APPLE INC 10.04% | Franklin Resources Inc 1.57% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% | CVS Health Corp 1.53% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% | Edison International 1.48% |
| ALPHABET INC 4.85% | Target Corp 1.48% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.64% | Kimco Realty Corp 1.46% |
| ALPHABET INC 4.48% | Simon Property Group Inc 1.45% |
| TESLA INC 3.58% | Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | Nasdaq Composite | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.6% | +12.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.1 pts | −4.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 87.4% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1022 | 78 |
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SPYD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SPYD?
- ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ONEQ and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources