Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ONEQ vs SCHG: how they differ
ONEQ and SCHG hold 66% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SCHG hold 66% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ONEQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 11.24% | 11.02% |
| APPLE INC | 10.04% | 9.84% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 7.32% | 7.18% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 6.37% | 5.68% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.85% | 4.76% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.64% | 4.55% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.48% | 3.78% |
| TESLA INC | 3.58% | 3.92% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.03% | 3.46% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.84% | 2.94% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 0.93% | 1.48% |
| NETFLIX INC | 0.79% | 1.27% |
| Only in ONEQ | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.38% | Eli Lilly & Co 3.06% |
| WALMART INC 2.02% | Visa Inc 1.92% |
| INTEL CORP 1.25% | Mastercard Inc 1.41% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04% | UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.20% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.87% | General Electric Co 1.19% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.78% | GE Vernova Inc 0.91% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 0.60% | Linde PLC 0.81% |
| QUALCOMM INC 0.58% | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Schwab |
| What it is | Nasdaq Composite | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.6% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 87.4% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 1022 | 193 |
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SCHG?
- ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ONEQ and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 66% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources