Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs RSP: how they differ

ONEQ and RSP hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and RSP hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and RSP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQRSP
INTEL CORP1.25%0.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC1.84%0.33%
SANDISK CORP/DE0.55%0.32%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.39%0.31%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.0.60%0.27%
QUALCOMM INC0.58%0.26%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.44%0.24%
AMAZON.COM INC6.37%0.24%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC2.38%0.24%
BROADCOM INC4.64%0.24%
KLA CORP0.55%0.23%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.87%0.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in RSP
LINDE PLC 0.50%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.42%Ciena Corp. 0.30%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.39%Centene Corp. 0.29%
SHOPIFY INC 0.32%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.28%
ASML HOLDING NV 0.31%Dell Technologies Inc. 0.27%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.19%Humana Inc. 0.27%
ROCKET LAB CORP 0.18%Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. 0.26%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.17%Jabil Inc. 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isNasdaq CompositeS&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%99.1%
Holdings1022503

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or RSP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and RSP returned +14.8%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or RSP?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources