Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and PULS returned +4.2%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ONEQ or PULS?

ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs PULS: how they differ

ONEQ and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQ	Only in PULS
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
APPLE INC 10.04%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
TESLA INC 3.58%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	PGIM
What it is	Nasdaq Composite	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+20.6%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.1 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.21%	0.15%
Holdings	1022	553

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and PULS returned +4.2%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or PULS?: ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources