Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs VBK: how they differ

NOBL and VBK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VBK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NOBL and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNOBLVBK
Nordson Corp.1.49%0.45%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.1.50%0.24%
Albemarle Corp.1.31%0.23%
A O Smith Corp.1.28%0.20%
Erie Indemnity Co.1.23%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBLOnly in VBK
Nucor Corp. 1.77%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%Natera Inc 1.04%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%Twilio Inc 0.88%
Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%
Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

NOBL and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerProSharesVanguard
What it isS&P 500 Dividend AristocratsSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+9.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−8.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%10.2%
Holdings69545

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VBK?
NOBL charges 0.35% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources