Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs SDY: how they differ

NOBL and SDY hold 53% of their weight in the same names, and SDY returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and SDY hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NOBL and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNOBLSDY
AbbVie, Inc.1.56%1.63%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.1.61%1.54%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.1.49%1.75%
Kenvue, Inc.1.47%1.76%
Target Corp.1.41%1.55%
Sysco Corp.1.49%1.41%
Realty Income Corp.1.41%2.14%
Eversource Energy1.50%1.35%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.1.44%1.34%
PepsiCo, Inc.1.37%1.33%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.1.68%1.30%
Chevron Corp.1.44%1.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBLOnly in SDY
Linde plc 1.48%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Chubb Ltd. 1.39%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
Amcor plc 1.39%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
Medtronic plc 1.32%Edison International 1.45%
Pentair plc 1.16%WEC Energy Group Inc 1.41%
Southern Co/The 1.33%
Microchip Technology Inc 1.32%
Medtronic PLC 1.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

NOBL and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerProSharesState Street
What it isS&P 500 Dividend AristocratsSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+9.4%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−8.1 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%84.6%
Holdings69155

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and SDY returned +11.0%, so SDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or SDY?
NOBL charges 0.35% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 53% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources