Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs VPL: how they differ

MUB and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUBOnly in VPL
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%SK hynix Inc 4.12%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%Toyota Motor Corp 1.74%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%BHP Group Ltd 1.66%
State of New Jersey 0.13%Hitachi Ltd 1.18%
State of California 0.13%Advantest Corp 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
VPL
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isNational Muni BondPacific Stock
Total return, 1 year+0.1%+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.4 pts+19.4 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.07%
Holdings66032335

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VPL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VPL?
MUB charges 0.05% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources