Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SPHQ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or SPHQ?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs SPHQ: how they differ

MUB and SPHQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and SPHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in SPHQ
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Visa Inc. 4.69%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Apple Inc. 4.51%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Mastercard Inc. 4.32%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	General Electric Co. 4.16%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Lam Research Corp. 4.10%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%
State of California 0.13%	Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	National Muni Bond	S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.15%
Holdings	6603	99

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SPHQ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or SPHQ?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources