Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SCHH?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so SCHH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or SCHH?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs SCHH: how they differ

MUB and SCHH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHH returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and SCHH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in SCHH
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	Welltower Inc 9.64%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Prologis Inc 8.97%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Equinix Inc 4.89%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Simon Property Group Inc 4.48%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	American Tower Corp 4.35%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Realty Income Corp 4.00%
State of California 0.13%	Public Storage 3.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

MUB and SCHH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	National Muni Bond	US REIT
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−7.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.07%
Holdings	6603	117

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SCHH?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so SCHH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or SCHH?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against SCHH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources