Which returned more over the last year, MUB or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or ONEQ?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs ONEQ: how they differ

MUB and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in ONEQ
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	APPLE INC 10.04%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
State of California 0.13%	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

MUB and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	National Muni Bond	Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	+3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.21%
Holdings	6603	1022

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or ONEQ?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources