Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MTUM vs XRT: how they differ

MTUM and XRT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MTUM and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMTUMXRT
WALMART INC.2.76%1.27%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.0.90%1.22%
CARVANA CO.0.62%1.32%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.40%1.38%
ROSS STORES, INC.0.31%1.24%
EBAY INC.0.24%1.42%
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION0.08%1.42%
DOLLAR TREE, INC.0.05%1.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MTUMOnly in XRT
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57%Groupon Inc 1.78%
BROADCOM INC. 5.41%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.84%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76%Coupang Inc 1.55%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MTUM and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Momentum FactorSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+21.8%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.3 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50098.2%22.5%
Holdings12575

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and XRT returned −3.0%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or XRT?
MTUM charges 0.15% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MTUM against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources