Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VYM: how they differ

MOAT and VYM hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VYM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVYM
Broadcom Inc2.43%8.07%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%0.91%
Walt Disney Co/The1.19%0.77%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.43%0.52%
Blackstone Inc1.28%0.39%
US Bancorp1.39%0.37%
Mondelez International Inc2.34%0.33%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.15%0.32%
NIKE Inc2.02%0.22%
Zoetis Inc1.82%0.21%
Kenvue Inc2.59%0.14%
Otis Worldwide Corp2.24%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VYM
Airbnb Inc 2.56%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Datadog Inc 2.44%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Danaher Corp 2.41%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Veeva Systems Inc 2.41%Chevron Corp 1.51%
Applied Materials Inc 2.34%Bank of America Corp 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%92.2%
Holdings55608

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VYM?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources