Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VIG: how they differ

MOAT and VIG hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VIG returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VIG hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVIG
Broadcom Inc2.43%5.21%
Microsoft Corp2.20%3.99%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%0.98%
Amphenol Corp1.50%0.82%
Danaher Corp2.41%0.51%
Mondelez International Inc2.34%0.36%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.15%0.35%
Motorola Solutions Inc1.24%0.33%
NIKE Inc2.02%0.24%
Zoetis Inc1.82%0.22%
Agilent Technologies Inc1.39%0.15%
Constellation Brands Inc2.32%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VIG
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Apple Inc 4.10%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Walmart Inc 2.62%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Visa Inc 2.34%
Veeva Systems Inc 2.41%Costco Wholesale Corp 2.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%95.7%
Holdings55332

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VIG returned +12.4%, so VIG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VIG?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources