Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VHT: how they differ

MOAT and VHT hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VHT hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVHT
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.43%1.84%
Danaher Corp2.41%1.84%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.18%2.93%
Agilent Technologies Inc1.39%0.61%
Zoetis Inc1.82%0.54%
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc2.21%0.45%
Veeva Systems Inc2.41%0.43%
West Pharmaceutical Services Inc1.70%0.37%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc2.30%0.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VHT
Masco Corp 2.96%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Amgen Inc 2.87%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%85.6%
Holdings55401

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VHT?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources