Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs SPMO: how they differ

MOAT and SPMO hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SPMO hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATSPMO
NVIDIA Corp2.45%8.46%
Broadcom Inc2.43%7.58%
Applied Materials Inc2.34%1.77%
Amphenol Corp1.50%1.30%
Charles Schwab Corp/The2.45%0.55%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.15%0.35%
Hershey Co/The1.22%0.12%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc1.17%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in SPMO
Masco Corp 2.96%Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Alphabet Inc. 4.81%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Alphabet Inc. 3.81%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Lam Research Corp. 3.54%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Intel Corp. 2.95%
Danaher Corp 2.41%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckInvesco
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%100.0%
Holdings5599

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or SPMO?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources