Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs SDY: how they differ

MOAT and SDY hold 7% of their weight in the same names.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SDY hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATSDY
Kenvue Inc2.59%1.76%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%1.33%
NIKE Inc2.02%1.15%
McCormick & Co Inc/MD1.29%0.60%
Clorox Co/The2.21%0.58%
Jack Henry & Associates Inc1.33%0.49%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.15%0.47%
Microsoft Corp2.20%0.36%
Brown-Forman Corp2.49%0.20%
West Pharmaceutical Services Inc1.70%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in SDY
Masco Corp 2.96%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Target Corp 1.55%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckState Street
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%84.6%
Holdings55155

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and SDY returned +11.0%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or SDY?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources