Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MINT vs XLV: how they differ
MINT and XLV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MINT | Only in XLV |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury 6.51% | Eli Lilly & Co 16.56% |
| Fannie Mae 1.18% | Johnson & Johnson 10.67% |
| Freddie Mac 1.04% | AbbVie Inc 7.76% |
| SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% | UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% | Merck & Co Inc 5.54% |
| AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% | Amgen Inc 3.41% |
| Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25% |
| INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% | Abbott Laboratories 2.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | State Street |
| What it is | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad | Health care |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.4% | +20.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.1 pts | +2.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 9.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 977 | 59 |
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
XLV in plain words
XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or XLV?
- MINT charges 0.36% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MINT and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources