Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs XLG: how they differ

MINT and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINTOnly in XLG
United States Treasury 6.51%NVIDIA Corp. 13.10%
Fannie Mae 1.18%Apple Inc. 10.76%
Freddie Mac 1.04%Microsoft Corp. 8.18%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%Alphabet Inc. 6.05%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%Broadcom Inc. 4.85%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%Alphabet Inc. 4.82%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MINT and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOInvesco
What it isEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-TradS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+4.4%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.1 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.20%
Already in the S&P 5009.7%100.0%
Holdings97751

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or XLG?
MINT charges 0.36% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MINT and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources