Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs XLC: how they differ

MINT and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MINT returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINTOnly in XLC
United States Treasury 6.51%Meta Platforms Inc 19.93%
Fannie Mae 1.18%Alphabet Inc 13.10%
Freddie Mac 1.04%Alphabet Inc 10.44%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%Netflix Inc 4.84%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%Comcast Corp 4.71%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MINT and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOState Street
What it isEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-TradCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+4.4%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.1 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.08%
Already in the S&P 5009.7%100.0%
Holdings97723

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and XLC returned −2.0%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or XLC?
MINT charges 0.36% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MINT and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources