Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs URTH: how they differ

MINT and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MINT and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMINTURTH
STANDARD CHARTERED PLC0.00%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINTOnly in URTH
United States Treasury 6.51%NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%
Fannie Mae 1.18%APPLE INC. 5.04%
Freddie Mac 1.04%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%ALPHABET INC. 2.43%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%BROADCOM INC. 2.21%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%ALPHABET INC. 2.01%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MINT and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOiShares
What it isEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-TradMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+4.4%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.1 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.24%
Already in the S&P 5009.7%70.3%
Holdings9771322

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or URTH?
MINT charges 0.36% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MINT and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources