Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MINT or SCHP?

MINT charges 0.36% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs SCHP: how they differ

MINT and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MINT returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINT	Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 6.51%	United States Treasury 4.09%
Fannie Mae 1.18%	United States Treasury 4.03%
Freddie Mac 1.04%	United States Treasury 4.02%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%	United States Treasury 3.79%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%	United States Treasury 3.62%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%	United States Treasury 3.42%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%	United States Treasury 3.39%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MINT and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Schwab
What it is	Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+4.4%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.1 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.36%	0.03%
Holdings	977	48

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or SCHP?: MINT charges 0.36% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources