Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MINT vs SCHG: how they differ
MINT and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MINT | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury 6.51% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| Fannie Mae 1.18% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| Freddie Mac 1.04% | Microsoft Corp 7.18% |
| SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Schwab |
| What it is | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.4% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 9.7% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 977 | 193 |
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or SCHG?
- MINT charges 0.36% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MINT and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources