Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs PULS: how they differ

MINT and PULS hold 4% of their weight in the same names.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and PULS hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MINT and PULS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMINTPULS
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE0.34%0.28%
M&T Bank Auto Receivables Trust0.34%0.27%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO0.25%0.41%
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA0.29%0.25%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC0.39%0.22%
NTT FINANCE CORP0.20%0.28%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO0.18%0.29%
GENERAL MOTORS FINL CO0.19%0.16%
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP0.19%0.16%
Stellantis Financial Underwritten Enhanc0.16%0.23%
SOUTHERN CAL EDISON0.26%0.14%
BMW US CAPITAL LLC0.35%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINTOnly in PULS
United States Treasury 6.51%PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
Fannie Mae 1.18%GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
Freddie Mac 1.04%Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

MINT and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOPGIM
What it isEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-TradPGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year+4.4%+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.1 pts−13.3 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.15%
Holdings977553

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or PULS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or PULS?
MINT charges 0.36% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources