Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MINT vs NOBL: how they differ
MINT and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MINT | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury 6.51% | Nucor Corp. 1.77% |
| Fannie Mae 1.18% | West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73% |
| Freddie Mac 1.04% | International Business Machines Corp. 1.71% |
| SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67% |
| AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% |
| Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% | Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61% |
| INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | ProShares |
| What it is | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.4% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.1 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 9.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 977 | 69 |
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or NOBL?
- MINT charges 0.36% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MINT and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources