Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MGK vs SPHQ: how they differ

MGK and SPHQ hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and SPHQ hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MGK and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMGKSPHQ
Apple Inc12.19%4.51%
Lam Research Corp1.93%4.10%
Visa Inc1.82%4.69%
KLA Corp1.48%3.27%
Mastercard Inc1.47%4.32%
GE Vernova Inc1.21%3.15%
Applied Materials Inc1.13%2.80%
TJX Cos Inc/The0.70%1.79%
AppLovin Corp0.65%1.56%
Western Digital Corp0.52%2.15%
Monster Beverage Corp0.40%0.82%
Moody's Corp0.40%0.86%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MGKOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA Corp 13.29%Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%General Electric Co. 4.16%
Alphabet Inc 5.93%Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%
Alphabet Inc 4.67%Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%
Amazon.com Inc 4.47%Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46%
Broadcom Inc 4.28%Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.08%Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87%
Tesla Inc 3.93%Gilead Sciences, Inc. 2.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MGK and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardInvesco
What it isMega Cap GrowthS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+14.9%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.6 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50099.2%99.9%
Holdings5699

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MGK or SPHQ?
MGK charges 0.07% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MGK and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MGK against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources