Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs XRT: how they differ

MAGS and XRT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XRT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MAGS and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMAGSXRT
Amazon.com Inc4.11%1.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGSOnly in XRT
TREASURY BILL 65.41%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
Apple Inc 4.12%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Tesla Inc 4.07%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%Coupang Inc 1.55%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Alphabet Inc 2.89%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MAGS and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerRoundhillState Street
What it isMagnificent SevenSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+14.4%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.30%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50026.5%22.5%
Holdings975

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XRT returned −3.0%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or XRT?
MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources