Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VTEB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or VTEB?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so VTEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs VTEB: how they differ

MAGS and VTEB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VTEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in VTEB
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	University of California 0.12%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority 0.12%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%	Colorado State Education Loan Program 0.11%
Apple Inc 4.12%	State of California 0.11%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%	New York City Transitional Finance Autho 0.09%
Tesla Inc 4.07%	Dallas Independent School District 0.09%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.09%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%	Ohio Water Development Authority Water P 0.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MAGS and VTEB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	Vanguard
What it is	Magnificent Seven	Tax-Exempt Bond
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+0.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−17.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.03%
Holdings	9	10185

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

VTEB in plain words

VTEB is a bond fund tracking the Tax-Exempt Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VTEB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VTEB?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so VTEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against VTEB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against VTEB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-VTEB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources