Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs VPU: how they differ
MAGS and VPU hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VPU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in VPU |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | NextEra Energy Inc 11.84% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Southern Co/The 6.70% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | Duke Energy Corp 6.31% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | Constellation Energy Corp 5.86% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | American Electric Power Co Inc 4.47% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | Sempra 3.85% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Dominion Energy Inc 3.78% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | Vistra Corp 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | VPU Vanguard Utilities Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Vanguard |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Utilities |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +2.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −15.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 90.1% |
| Holdings | 9 | 66 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
VPU in plain words
VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VPU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VPU returned +2.1%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or VPU?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so VPU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources