Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs SCHH: how they differ
MAGS and SCHH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and SCHH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Welltower Inc 9.64% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Prologis Inc 8.97% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | Equinix Inc 4.89% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | American Tower Corp 4.35% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Realty Income Corp 4.00% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | Public Storage 3.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Schwab |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 9 | 117 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or SCHH?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources