Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or PDBC?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs PDBC: how they differ

MAGS and PDBC are both equity index funds, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against +14.4%.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

MAGS and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	Invesco
What it is	Magnificent Seven	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.59%
Holdings	9	not filed

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or PDBC?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against PDBC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-PDBC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources