Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs MINT: how they differ
MAGS and MINT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in MINT |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | United States Treasury 6.51% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Fannie Mae 1.18% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | Freddie Mac 1.04% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | PIMCO |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +4.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −13.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.36% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 9.7% |
| Holdings | 9 | 977 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or MINT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and MINT returned +4.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or MINT?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and MINT charges 0.36%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and MINT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 10% of MINT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against MINT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-MINT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources