Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
LYTE vs VUG: how they differ
LYTE and VUG are measured over different days, and VUG charges 0.03% against 0.65%.
Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.
| LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF | VUG Vanguard Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Vanguard |
| What it is | Photonics and optics | US growth |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +12.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | −0.6% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −4.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 147 |
LYTE in plain words
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
VUG in plain words
VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, LYTE or VUG?
- LYTE charges 0.65% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are LYTE and VUG the same kind of fund?
- No. LYTE is a thematic ETF and VUG is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LYTE against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LYTE-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources