Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LYTE vs MTUM: how they differ

LYTE and MTUM are measured over different days, and MTUM charges 0.15% against 0.65%.

Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

LYTE and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LYTE
Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerRoundhilliShares
What it isPhotonics and opticsMSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days−0.6%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.65%0.15%
Holdingsnot filed125

LYTE in plain words

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, LYTE or MTUM?
LYTE charges 0.65% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are LYTE and MTUM the same kind of fund?
No. LYTE is a thematic ETF and MTUM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LYTE against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LYTE against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LYTE-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources