Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VHT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VHT?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VHT: how they differ

LQD is a bond index fund and VHT an equity index fund, and over the year VHT returned more, +21.6% against −2.7%.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

LQD and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VHT Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Health Care
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+4.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.09%
Holdings	not filed	401

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VHT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VHT?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources