Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VBK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VBK?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VBK: how they differ

LQD is a bond index fund and VBK an equity index fund, and over the year VBK returned more, +13.8% against −2.7%.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

LQD and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Small-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.05%
Holdings	not filed	545

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VBK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VBK?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources