Which returned more over the last year, LQD or USFR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so USFR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or USFR?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs USFR: how they differ

LQD and USFR are both bond index funds, and over the year USFR returned more, +4.1% against −2.7%.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

LQD and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	WisdomTree
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−13.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	4

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or USFR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so USFR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or USFR?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources