Which returned more over the last year, LQD or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or PDBC?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs PDBC: how they differ

LQD is a bond index fund and PDBC an equity index fund, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against −2.7%.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

LQD and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.59%

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or PDBC?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against PDBC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-PDBC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources